The device or software is submitted for certification
But defects don’t just affect your budget. They lead to consequences such as frustrated customers, downtime, security breaches and being penalised for regulatory non-compliance.
Automation is seen as a cost, not an investment. Purpose-built tools and structured frameworks are dismissed as ‘overkill’. Certification exposes the gaps.
There’s a reason domain-specific tools and structured testing frameworks matter. With a cohesive, automated, tried-and-tested approach to finding defects or flaws, you can offer positive digital experiences at speed but more importantly, meet standard-based requirements that can help get your product to market in the first place.
If only meeting development timelines and regulatory standards were that easy. Here’s the approach we take:
We integrated CI+ conformance testing into existing CI/CD and QE workflows so distributed teams could run ~200 tests on demand and nightly, rather than late in the QA cycle. What previously took around two weeks of manual execution per engineer dropped to 2–3 days automated, surfacing failures early and turning certification from a release bottleneck into a continuous confidence signal.
If you want to know more about the tools and partnerships that help us deliver Total Quality, here’s a list: