Tools and partnerships
Fixing a defect in production can cost up to 100x (or more) than if it’s spotted during the requirements phase.
But defects don’t just affect your budget. They lead to consequences such as frustrated customers, downtime, security breaches and being penalised for regulatory non-compliance.
The device or software is submitted for certification
The results come back with issues
Teams rush to diagnose and fix them
Release plans slip as retesting begins
Testing is treated as a late-stage hurdle rather than a continuous discipline
Automation is seen as a cost, not an investment. Purpose-built tools and structured frameworks are dismissed as ‘overkill’. Certification exposes the gaps.
There’s a reason domain-specific tools and structured testing frameworks matter. With a cohesive, automated, tried-and-tested approach to finding defects or flaws, you can offer positive digital experiences at speed but more importantly, meet standard-based requirements that can help get your product to market in the first place.
Trusted by leading organisations
Helping organisations improve quality, resilience and delivery confidence across complex digital estates.
What if you could…
Speed up delivery cycles without compromising quality
Get audit-ready certification evidence before applying for CI Plus, HbbTV and other specifications
Fortify your software from vulnerabilities and threats, in accordance with CRA
Achieve net-zero objectives for innovative energy systems
OUR APPROACH
A joined-up approach that gets you release and audit-ready
If only meeting development timelines and regulatory standards were that easy. Here’s the approach we take:
A single connected assurance model – we call it Total Quality
Automation-driven tooling, human-led
End-to-end assurance across the lifecycle, not only pre-release
Integrated assurance practices delivering synergies for quality
Assurance across multiple ecosystems, environments and operating conditions
Managed, evidence-based assurance, not an isolated testing intervention
CASE STUDY
Scaling CI+ conformance testing with automated tooling
We integrated CI+ conformance testing into existing CI/CD and QE workflows so distributed teams could run ~200 tests on demand and nightly, rather than late in the QA cycle. What previously took around two weeks of manual execution per engineer dropped to 2–3 days automated, surfacing failures early and turning certification from a release bottleneck into a continuous confidence signal.
How we can help
If you want to know more about the tools and partnerships that help us deliver Total Quality, here’s a list:
Our experts
Paul Harding
Paul Harding is a Bid Manager and commercial specialist with close to 30 years’ experience in sales and business winning, including more than 20 years leading complex bids and tenders across regulated sectors.
Why Resillion?
Proprietary, standards led tools
Official and Resillion developed tools for HbbTV, DVB, CI Plus, CRA and enterprise testing – built to match real certification and regulatory requirements, not generic testing
Trusted by standards bodies and regulators
Our tools are aligned with industry bodies and certification schemes, providing defensible, audit-ready assurance evidence
Automation at scale, engineered in‑house
Automation-led frameworks like TestWizard and Ligada iSuite accelerate testing while maintaining robustness, repeatability and evidence quality across complex environments
Integrated assurance, not standalone tools
Tooling is embedded into a broader assurance model covering quality, security, compliance and interoperability across the lifecycle – not sold or deployed in isolation
Deep partnerships for regulated innovation
We work with academic, industry and government partners, including PNDC and the University of Strathclyde, to validate emerging energy and infrastructure systems with independent, third-party evidence
Built for complex, connected ecosystems
Our tools support multidevice, multimarket and multisystem landscapes, from broadcast and IoT to enterprise IT and whole energy systems, where interoperability and compliance risk is highest
