GRC for development and engineering standards
Turn development requirements into controls you can manage and prove
We turn complex regulatory, security and organisational requirements into practical controls and checks. This gives you clearer evidence of compliance and better accountability.
Independently recognised and accredited
Our accreditations and certifications show our commitment to recognised standards for quality, security, testing and assurance.
Make GRC part of how you develop software
Resillion’s GRC for Development and Engineering offering helps you establish, assess and improve the governance and controls that underpin your software development lifecycle.
We connect regulations, standards and internal policies to practical engineering controls, assess risks across your SDLC, processes, tools and teams, and identify where controls need to be strengthened. We then validate whether those controls work in practice, not just whether they are documented, and provide evidence of their effectiveness.
This turns engineering standards into defined controls, clear responsibilities and measurable practices that can be tested, evidenced and maintained as your technology, teams and regulatory requirements change. We can help you align development practices with requirements including NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act, DORA, the EU AI Act, ISO 27001 and relevant IEC/ISO and industry standards.
BENEFITS
Know that your development controls are working
Resillion helps you achieve:
Clearer standards across your engineering teams
Fewer gaps across your delivery toolchains
Stronger control evidence from real environments
Higher quality across your systems and applications
Better alignment with your compliance obligations
Greater confidence in every software release
Challenge
A leading financial institution needed to move away from legacy waterfall processes and outdated IT systems that were slowing delivery, frustrating customers and making internal service tools harder to improve.
Approach
Resillion supported a three-phase DevOps transformation, starting with workflow assessment across mobile applications, mainframe solutions and internal support systems. The team redesigned SDLC processes, aligned stakeholders, embedded CI/CD principles and provided hands-on coaching.
Result
The programme accelerated software delivery, improved customer satisfaction, enhanced employee engagement and created a lasting cultural shift towards modern digital delivery.
WHY US?
We connect GRC requirements with engineering reality
Many GRC programmes focus on policies, frameworks and documentation. Our approach goes further by testing how requirements translate into real engineering practices.
Regulatory and standards mapping
What this does for you
Map regulations, standards and policies to development requirements and controls.
Result
Clearer compliance obligations
SDLC risk assessment
What this does for you
Identify security, compliance, quality and operational risks across your development lifecycle.
Result
A prioritised view of development risk
Control framework design
What this does for you
Define practical, measurable controls across development, testing, change and release.
Result
Clearer control ownership and accountability
Control effectiveness assessment
What this does for you
Assess whether controls are implemented and operating as intended.
Result
Evidence of control effectiveness
Engineering governance assessment
What this does for you
Review roles, responsibilities, processes and decision-making across delivery teams.
Result
Stronger governance and oversight
Ongoing assurance
What this does for you
Validate controls and reassess them as your technology, delivery model and requirements change.
Result
Sustained compliance and risk management
WHY NOW
If you can’t evidence your controls, can you really say you’re compliant?
As development becomes faster and more distributed, relying on policies and manual checks creates growing risk.
Without effective engineering GRC:
Regulatory requirements remain disconnected from development practices
Control ownership is unclear across engineering and security teams
You may have controls on paper that don’t work in practice
Evidence is scattered across tools, teams and systems
Audits and regulatory reviews become harder to prepare for
Engineering risk is harder for leadership to see and manage
